The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because its learned counsel stated that the cause did not survive for adjudication. The order contained no substantive legal reasoning.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP No.12876 of 2000
S. Anjireddy
V The Govt of A.P. and others
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP No.12876 of 2000
Order : ( Per Sri GR, J )
Ms. Santosh Kumari, Advocate, representing Sri Ch. Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_______ GODA RAGHURAM, J
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
Date 6-12-12
kk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP No.12876 of 2000
Dated 6-12-2012
S. Anjireddy
The Govt of A.P.
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
