Writ petition dismissed as infructous on representation by counsel.
Writ petition dismissed as infructous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P.No.10563 of 2001
Raghu Industries Ltd V
E.O. Grampanchayat, Nallabanda gudem and others.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P.No.10563 of 2001
Order : ( Per Sri GR, J )
It is represented by Sri V.S. Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructous. No costs.
_______
GODA RAGHURAM, J
________________________ M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
Date : 8-11-12 kk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P. No.10563 of 2001
Dated 8-11-2012
Raghu Industries Ltd
E.O. Grampanchayat, Nallabanda gudem
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
