Naidu Cultural Club v. The Dy. I.G. of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought permission to withdraw the writ appeal. Permission was granted and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded.
The appellant sought permission to withdraw the writ appeal. Permission was granted and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEALNO.1108 OF 2012
DATED:7.9.2012
Between: Naidu Cultural Club Rep. by the President Burada Appalanaidu Vasavinagar Srikakulam Road Rajam Village, Srikakulam District … Appellant And The Deputy Inspector General of Police Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1108 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ appeal.
Permission is granted.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 7.9.2012
bnr
Naidu Cultural Club Rep. by the President Burada Appalanaidu
Deputy Inspector General of Police
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court