It requires to be noticed that the order of the Tribunal records that the learned State Representative for the Department had conceded (in the appeal before the Tribunal) to the contentions raised on behalf of the respondent-assessee regarding the competence of the revisional authority who proceeded to revise the appellate order, for the purpose of cancelling the penalty. The learned State Representative is recorded as having submitted before the Tribunal that it does not justify the impugned revisional order and that he stated that it has no tenable objections to the grounds urged by the appellant. It is this concession about the unsustainability of the revisional order, that has persuaded the Tribunal to allow the appeal preferred by the respondent-assessee. In the aforesaid circumstances, no interference is called for and the revision is accordingly dismissed after hearing Sri P.Balaji Varma, learned Special Govt. Pleader for Commercial Taxes.