The appellant abandoned the appeal. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without any costs.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
SPL.A. No. 30 of 1999
JUDGMENT:
(Per: Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Sri S.Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the appellant, states that the appellant does not wish to pursue this appeal.
Recording the submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
___________________________ JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM __________________________________ JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Dated: 20-12-2012 kvr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
SPL.A. No. 30 of 1999
(Judgment of a Division Bench delivered by Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
KVR
20-12-2012
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
