The court dismissed a second appeal because the appeal abated, as the legal representatives of the first appellant were not brought on record. No representation was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
SECOND APPEAL No.504 OF 1996
JUDGMENT:-
No representation for the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents relied upon the decision reported in Pinnamaneni
Madhava Rao Vs. Kolli Basavayya[1] . In view of the fact that the legal representatives of the 1st appellant were not brought on record, the appeal stands abated.
Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE N.R.L. NAGESWARA RAO
Date:30.07.2012 INL
[1] 1973 ALT 170
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal abated due to non-availability of the legal representatives of the first appellant on the record.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pinnamaneni Madhava Rao Vs. Kolli BasavayyaReferred¶4
Pinnamaneni Madhava Rao Vs. Kolli Basavayya 1973 ALT 170
Appellant No.1
Respondents
N.R.L. Nageswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
