No representation was available from the absent appellants' counsel. The second appeal was dismissed due to lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA
GOVINDARAJULU
SECOND APPEAL No. 329 of 2011
JUDGMENT:
The appellants’ counsel is absent today also, in spite of listing the matter under the caption of “For Dismissal”. There is no representation. It appears that the appellants are not interested to pursue the matter.
Hence, the second appeal is dismissed.
__________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J 03rd December, 2012
KSM
Samudrala Govindaraju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
