A single-judge order dismissing an appeal for nonprosecution due to lack of representation by the appellants on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
M.A.C.M.A. No.3620 of 2011
Date: February 03, 2012
Between:
1. C. Kusumakumari & another. … Appellants/
Claimants
And
1. A. Venkatasubbaiah & another … Respondents/ Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
M.A.C.M.A. No.3620 of 2011
JUDGMENT:
Even though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the appellants.
The appeal is therefore dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
_________________ R. KANTHA RAO, J.
Date: February 03, 2012.
BSB
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
M.A.C.M.A. No.3620 of 2011
Date: February 03, 2012
BSB
C. Kusumakumari & another
A. Venkatasubbaiah & another
R. KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
