A perusalof the order revealsthat the Tribunalpasseda well consideredorder by takinginto considerationall the aspects and as againstthe claim of Rs' 1,8O,0OO/ -'the Tribunalawardedan amorl.ntofRs.94,558/-withinterest@'gokperannumfrom 30.1 1.2004on which date the claimantwas examinedas P'W' 1 till the date ofreaiization. The Tribunal has framed Issue No'l as to whether the claimantsustained injuriesdue to the rash and negligent drivingof the driver of the ,secondrespondent's car bearing No.AP-13-D-2313,to whichthe Tribunalhas categorically stated that theaccidenttook place drie to the negligenceof the driver of the cari.e. the second respondentherein and has answered in favourof the first respondent hereinand againstthe second respondent.With regard to Issue No'2 as to whether the claimant is entitledfor compensation, il so, to what amountand from whom, in thelight of the decided case laws of the Apex Court' under the heads ofconventional charges and futureprospects, the Iirst respondent/claimant isentitled for more compensation, however, since thisis an appeal filed by the insurancecompany' this court is notinclinedto go into the other issues and this court finds that the compensationawarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable. Therefore,I see no reason to interfere with the orderof the Tribunal and theappea-lis liable to be dismissed'
