The Commissioner of Income Tax-Iv v. Moschip Semiconductor Technology Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE…
SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 163 of 2012
Dated: 26-11-2012
Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad And Moschip Semiconductor Technology Ltd., Hyderabad
…Appellant
…Respondent.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 163 of 2012
Judgment (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
This appeal by the Revenue preferred against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “A” Bench (for short ‘the Tribunal’) dated 13-11-2009 allowing ITA No. 323/Hyd/2009 is misconceived, since the order of the Tribunal is passed pusruant to an agreement between the assessee and the department that the expenditure in question should be treated as capital in nature and allowed depreciation at 60% on the said expenditure.
In the circumstances the appeal is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed.
_________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J
26th November, 2012
_______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
GRR
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad
Moschip Semiconductor Technology Ltd., Hyderabad
Goda Raghuram
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court