No substantive facts or reasoning provided. The order dismisses civil revision petitions solely because they were found to be infructuous, with no order as to costs. No parties named.
Civil revision petitions dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition Nos. 255 of 2010 & 4489 of 2011
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the civil revision petitions have become infructuous. Therefore, the civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. The miscellaneous petitions filed in these civil revision petitions shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
Date: 08.11.2012 JSU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Civil Revision Petition Nos. 255 of 2010 & 4489 of 2011
Date: 08.11.2012
JSU
L. Narasimha Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
