High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dismissed Civil Revision Petition No. 2882 of 2012 as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that no cause survived for adjudication.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2882 of 2012
BETWEEN
A. Jagadamba and another. AND
... PETITIONERS
M. Jayachandra Reddy and three others.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. V. ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondents: --NONE APPEARED--
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the revision petition has become infructuous and there survives no cause for adjudication.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
October 16, 2012
DSK
A. Jagadamba
M. Jayachandra Reddy and three others
Vilas V. Afzulkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
