A single-paragraph order where the High Court dismissed the criminal revision case as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission.
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR
Crl.R.C. No. 678 of 2005
DATED: 02.01.2012
Between:
Dr. K. Venkat Rao .. Petitioner
And
1. P. Naga Bushanam Rao
2. State of A.P.
Respondents
JUDGMENT:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
In view of his submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as having become infructuous.
__________________ N. RAVI
SHANKAR, J
02.01.2012
bcj
Dr. K. Venkat Rao
P. Naga Bushanam Rao
State of A.P.
N. RAVI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
