claiming that no reason is assigned to disbelieve the evidence of P.Ws.2 and 3 when they actually watched the movie as established and simply because they happened to be police personnel that by itself is not a ground to reject their evidence and the courts below properly appreciated the matter. 8. Therefore, it is to be seen as to whether the conviction and sentences imposed by the trial Court which were confirmed by the appellate Court are tenable or not. 9. P.Ws.2 and 3 deposed in accordance with the prosecution version. Emphatically, their evidence discloses that they actually watched the movie. It is also emphatical that P.W.5 seized the blue film marked as M.O.1. There is no dispute that it is only a blue film. It is also important that P.W.2 gave report to the police after watching the movie, on the basis of which the case was registered. 10. No doubt, no other member of the public who watched the movie was examined as witnesses in the case, but what is required is quality of evidence and not quantity of evidence. Even the evidence of Police personnel can be accepted to be true and correct provided it is trustworthy. In our society, it is always difficult to secure independent witnesses to examine them before a court of law in respect of a criminal charge for various reasons. In fact, nothing was elicited from the evidence of P.Ws.2 and 3 which is sufficient to discredit the entire prosecution version. No ground is shown as to why the police had to foist a false case against A.1 to A.3. Further it is admitted by P.W.4 that he made signature on the so called panchanama marked as Ex.P1. Absolutely there is no reason to disbelieve the evidence of P.W.2 and P.W.3 because it is trustworthy. In the circumstances, it is clear that having been managed by the defence, P.Ws.1 and 4 did not choose to support the prosecution version. Ultimately, I do not find any reason to discredit the evidence of P.Ws. 2 and 3 and accordingly it is
