Perugu Parvathi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. heard. Order affixed without substantive reasoning regarding the prayer.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
CRLP .NO:1385 of 2012
Between:
- 1 Perugu Parvathi, w/o. Late Venkatarao,
- 2 Perugu Potharaju, S/o. Late Venkatarao,
- 3 Perugu Suribabu, S/o. Nageswara Rao,
- 4 Kamala Ganga Rao, S/o. Krishna Murthy,
- 5 Rudram Satyanarayana, S/o.Swamy,
- 6 Talasila Venkata Ratnam, S/o. Venkata Subbaiah,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Perugu Parvathi and Others
- respondent
State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram
B. SESHASAYANA REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/1385/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court