Justice Ramesh Ranganathan granted the petitioner leave under Rule 100 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 to withdraw Company Petition No. 2 of 2011. The application was allowed, and the company petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw Company Petition No. 2 of 2011; C.P. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
COMPANY APPLICATION No.865 of 2012
and COMPANY PETITION No.2 of 2011
ORDER:
C.A.No.865 of 2012 is filed by the petitioner, under
Rule 100 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, seeking leave of
this Court to withdraw C.P.No.2 of 2011.
Leave as sought for is granted.
C.A.No.865 of 2012 is allowed, and C.P.No.2 of 2011 is,
accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN,J
Date:24.08.2012 usd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave should be granted to the petitioner to withdraw Company Petition No. 2 of 2011.
Whether the withdrawal of the company petition should be allowed under Rule 100 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner in C.A. No. 865 of 2012 and C.P. No. 2 of 2011
Respondent in C.A. No. 865 of 2012 and C.P. No. 2 of 2011
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
