The court disposed of a company application by condoning the inordinate delay in filing Form 66 in proof of debt, noting the application was not opposed.
Delay in filing Form 66 was condoned and the Company Application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
COMPANY APPLICATION No.535 OF 2012
ORDER:
The Company Application is not opposed by Sri M. Anil Kumar, Learned Counsel for the Official Liquidator. Hence, the delay, though inordinate, in filing Form No.66 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 in proof of debt with the respondent - Company, is condoned.
Company Application is, accordingly, disposed of.
_____________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
June 04, 2012 MD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
COMPANY APPLICATION No.535 OF 2012
June 04, 2012
MD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inordinate delay in filing Form 66 in proof of debt warrants condonation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
