A common order where the first appellant's counsel was absent. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution without engaging any legal issue or applying specific statutory provisions.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO
CMA No. 186 of 2009
Between
P. Bhaskara Rao V P. Umadevi
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S.APPA RAO
CMA No.186 of 2009
Common order : ( Per Sri GM, J )
Though the matter is listed under the caption of ‘for dismissal’, learned counsel for the appellant is not present. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.
GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
K.S. APPA RAO, J
Date 19-3-2012 Kk/
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO
CMA No.186 of 2009
19-3-2012
P. Bhaskara Rao
P. Umadevi
Ghulam Mohammad
K.S. Appa Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
