A common judgment dismissing two civil appeals (CMA Nos. 1455 & 1517 of 2003) for default as the appellant failed to appear or file representation before the court on the specified date.
Appeals dismissed for default; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
CMA NO. 1455 OF 2003 And CMA NO. 1517 OF 2003
DATED: 08.02.2012
CMA NO. 1455 OF 2003
Between: Pedapudi Satyavathi .. Appellant And Donipati Rama Chandra Rao and others .. Respondents CMA NO. 1517 OF 2003 Between: Pedapudi Satyavathi .. Appellant And
Pedapudi Krishna Murthy and others
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
CMA NO. 1455 OF 2003 And CMA NO. 1517 OF 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT:
When the matters are called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
The appeals are therefore, dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ Date: 08.02.2012 R. KANTHA RAO, J kvrm
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO
CMA NO. 1455 OF 2003 And CMA NO. 1517 OF 2003
DATED: 08.02.2012
R. KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
