Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners and counsel were absent despite multiple listings in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
Dismissal of the writ petition and consequent miscellaneous petitions for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.8632 of 2002
Between:
K. Hemalata & 2 others
.... Petitioners
And The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapally, Karimnagar Dist. & 3 others
....Respondents
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.8632 of 2002
ORDER:
There was no representation for the petitioners or their counsel when this matter was taken up for hearing by this Court on 25.01.2011, 08.03.2011, 30.04.2011, 21.06.2011 and 30.06.2011. It was accordingly directed to be listed for dismissal on 01.07.2011.
2. Today, yet again, there is no representation for the petitioners or their counsel when the matter is called.
3. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this Writ Petition
shall stand dismissed in consequence. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 1st July, 2011
KL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.8632 of 2002
Date: 1st July, 2011
KL
K. Hemalata
Revenue Divisional Officer
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
