B. Savitha v. The Chief Rationing Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The court declared the respondents' action of stopping essential commodity supplies to the petitioner's fair price shop illegal and arbitrary. It directed the department to continue supplies as long as the petitioner's authorization remains intact and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No.3 directed to continue supplies to the petitioner for distribution; Writ Petition disposed of.