The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being listed for dismissal. No order as to costs was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
W.P.No.6268 of 2003
Dated: 17-03-2011
Between: Sardar Trilok Singh Pishoriya …Petitioner AND The District Collector, R.R.District, Hyderabad and others
Respondents
This Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
W.P.No.6268 of 2003
ORDER:
Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’ there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Hence the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to
costs.
________________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J.
MARCH 17, 2011 Tsr.
Sardar Trilok Singh Pishoriya
The District Collector, R.R.District, Hyderabad
A. GOPAL REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
