The Court allowed a writ petition seeking mandamus for the registration of a land document in Kadapa District, relying on the reasoning of a previous order disposed in 2010 regarding similar issues.
Respondent No.4 directed to receive the document presented by the petitioner and process the same for registration in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
WRIT PETITION No.463 of 2011
DATED: 21-01-2011
Between: Obili Abdul Munaf. ..... PETITIONER And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Kadapa District & 3 others.
.....RESPONDENTS
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.4, in not registering the document presented by the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac.0.33 cents in Sy.No.241 of Masapet Revenue Village, Rayachoti mandal, Kadapa District, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. At the hearing, it is agreed to by the learned Counsel for the parties that W.P.No.6016 of 2010 pertaining to the property situated in Sy.Nos.1969/2, 1972, 1969/1B and 1971 of Doddipalli Village, Piler Mandal, Chittoor District, was disposed of by this Court by detailed order dated 02.07.2010. It is further agreed that as the reason for refusal to register the document in this Writ Petition is similar to the one raised in the above said Writ Petition, the same cannot be sustained in the light of the order passed therein.
3. Therefore, for the same reasons as contained in the order dated 02.07.2010 in W.P.No.6016 of 2010, this Writ Petition is allowed. Respondent No.4 is directed to receive the document presented by the petitioner and process the same for
registration in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
________________________ ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,J
21st January, 2011 Note: Furnish C.C. of the order within one week B/o Tsy/MR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for mandamus declaring the non-registration of a land document as illegal and arbitrary should be allowed based on a prior similar order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.6016 of 2010Relied on¶2
Obili Abdul Munaf
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Kadapa District
3 others
Ashutosh Mohunta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
