Smt. T. Anjanamma, v. The District Collector-cum-Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What did the court decide?
dismissal of writ petition with liberty to question the appellate authority's order
COURT JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
dismissal of writ petition with liberty to question the appellate authority's order
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
W.P. No.31560 of 2011
Between: Smt. T.Anjanamma … Petitioner and
The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Water Management Agency and Appellate Authority, YSR District, Kadapa and another.
… Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH W.P. No.31560 of 2011
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous as the appellate authority has passed an order, which has been received by the petitioner, recently. Therefore, he submits that this writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioner to question the validity of the order passed by the appellate authority.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioner to question the validity of the order stated to have been passed by the appellate authority. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
Date: 08.12.2011 LSK
Smt. T.Anjanamma
The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Water Management Agency and Appellate Authority, YSR District, Kadapa
G CHANDRAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court