M/s. Agi Glaspac v. Employee Provident Fund Organisation
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without any costs.
The single judge permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without any costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WP NO. 28896 OF 2010
Date of Judgment: 14.11.2011
Between:
M/s. AGI Glasspac, rep. by its Sr. Vice President ( P&A)
…Petitioner
and
Employees Provident Fund Organisation Kukatpally, Hyderabad and others
..Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WP NO. 28896 OF 2010
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
_________________________
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Dt. 14.11.2011 KR
M/s. AGI Glasspac, rep. by its Sr. Vice President ( P&A)
Employees Provident Fund Organisation Kukatpally, Hyderabad
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court