The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the High Court.
dismissed for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
WRIT PETITION NO.26042 OF 2003
13th July, 2011
BETWEEN:
DASARI SATYA SUDHARANI .. PETITIONER
AND THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
WRIT PETITION NO.26042 OF 2003
O R D E R:
Learned Standing Counsel for respondent 2-temple submits that the matter has become infructuous. Be that as it may, since none appears for the petitioner the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with miscellaneous petition.
NISAR AHMAD KAKRU, CJ 13th July, 2011.
NAGESH BABU
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
WRIT PETITION NO.26042 OF 2003
13th July, 2011
Dasari Satya Sudharani
The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt. of A.P., Hyderabad
Nisar Ahmad Kakru
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
