Kum.D.Shoba v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its
Case brief
What is this about?
MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition…
MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Writ Petition Nos.25746, 27393 of 2009; 16943, 18746, 18872, 19117, 20466, 21283 and 21855 of 2010
DT.20.01.2011
Between:
P.Srinivasulu
… Petitioner (W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
And
The District Collector, Chittoor District and another
… Respondents (W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ch.Srinivas
(W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
Counsel for respondents: GP for Panchayat Raj
(W.P.No.25746 of 2009)
The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:
In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners, who are Field Assistants, Technical Assistants, Computer Operators and Agriculturists, as the case may be, have questioned the notices demanding certain amounts towards alleged misappropriation of funds under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.
At the hearing, it is agreed between the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for the respective parties that the issues raised in these writ petitions are squarely covered by the judgment of
this Court, dated 19.01.2011, in W.P.No.22984 of 2010 and batch. Having regard to the same, these writ petitions are allowed in terms of the said judgment with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order.
(C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J)
Date:20.01.2011 VGB
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.22984 of 2010Followed¶18
P.Srinivasulu
The District Collector, Chittoor District
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court