The writ petitioner was absent on the date of hearing despite multiple notices. The court dismissed the petition for default due to lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.1590 OF 2008
DATE: 12.12.2011
BETWEEN: H.Rajendar Reddy .. Petitioner And The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC and others
.. Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.1590 OF 2008
OREDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner on several times. Today i.e. on 12.12.2011 also there is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ R.KANTHA RAO,J
Dated: 12.12.2011 kvrm
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.1590 OF 2008
DATE: 12.12.2011
H.Rajendar Reddy
The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC
R.KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
