The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that counsel represented it had become so. No order as to costs was passed.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.14764 of 2005
Dated:03.02.2011
Between:
Asam Pulla Reddy and others.
...Petitioners
And
The Special Deputy Collector and others.
...Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.14764 of 2005
ORDER: Counsel Sri K.R.Shashidar Naik, representing Counsel for the petitioners Sri Ramachandra Reddy, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
03.02.2011 vs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition No.14764 of 2005 has become infructuous.
Asam Pulla Reddy and others
The Special Deputy Collector and others
V.V.S.RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
