The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition by the petitioner who claimed alternative land had been allotted, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.12646 OF 2010
DATE: 15.12.2011
BETWEEN: Satish Kumar Shah and another .. Petitioners And Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority and others
.. Respondents
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.12646 OF 2010
OREDER:
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners seek to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that alternative land has been allotted.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ R.KANTHA RAO,J
Dated: 15.12.2011 kvrm
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
W.P.No.12646 OF 2010
DATE: 15.12.2011
Satish Kumar Shah
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
R.KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
