Vadde P. v. Subbarayudu v Kopparapu Rama Subbaiah (diedd) By L.Rs.
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous without any substantive order as to costs.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous without any substantive order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
SECOND APPEAL No. 110 of 2004.
JUDGEMENT:
The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in this second appeal does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission, the second appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________ R.KANTHA RAO, J 07.07.2011. KRB.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
SECOND APPEAL No. 110 of 2004.
JUDGEMENT:
Dt. 07.07.2011
R.KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court