The High Court closed a civil revision petition seeking eviction as infructuous, noting that the petitioner/tenant had already vacated the premises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5502 of 2010
Date: August 04, 2011
**Between: Mohd. Jahid Ali … Petitioner And S. Lingappa … Respondent * * ***
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5502 of 2010
O R D E R:
This civil revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 17th September 2010, passed in R.A. No.69 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the R.A. filed by the petitioner herein against the order dated 22.12.2009 passed in R.C. No.266 of 2007 on the file of IV Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, which was filed seeking eviction of the tenant from the petition schedule premises, was dismissed.
2. It is submitted that the petitioner/tenant has already vacated the premises and therefore the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
3. The civil revision petition is accordingly closed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
_________________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J
Date: August 04, 2011.
BSB
Mohd. Jahid Ali
S. Lingappa
B. CHANDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
