The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition as infructuous based on the submission of counsel. No substantive legal principle or ruling was delivered; the matter was disposed of procedurally without reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4553 OF 2008
DATE:25-02-2011
BETWEEN
Chenumola Varun Kumar …Petitioner AND Chanumolu Vijaya Lakshmi & Others
…Respondents
THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4553 OF 2008
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subjectmatter of the revision has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the revision is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
_______________ A. GOPAL REDDY, J.
FEBRUARY 25, 2011 Tsr.
Chenumola Varun Kumar
Chanumolu Vijaya Lakshmi & Others
A. GOPAL REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
