The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the revision petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
Thursday, August 18, 2011.
Present:
The Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Chandra Kumar
C.R.P.No. 2682 of 2010
Between: The Gramapanchayat Narasannapeta, Narasannapeta Post and Mandl, Srikakulam District.
..Petitioner
and
B.Srinivasa Rao and others
…Respondents
The Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Chandra Kumar
C.R.P.No. 2682 of 2010
O r d e r:
It is represented that the cause raised for consideration in this revision petition has become infructuous. Accordingly the revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
________________________ B. CHANDRA KUMAR, J. August 18, 2011.
*BVS
The Gramapanchayat Narasannapeta, Narasannapeta Post and Mandl, Srikakulam District
B.Srinivasa Rao and others
B. Chandra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
