Pinnapothu Easwara Rao v. v.Rajendra Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.499 OF 2004
JUDGMENT:
This Court passed the following order on 06.04.2009:“A memo filed signed by the petitioner herein and the first respondent-complainant stating that both parties have settled the matter and in pursuance of the same, the petitioner paid Rs.45,000/- towards full and final satisfaction of the amount due to the complainant and that compromise may be recorded acquitting the petitioner. The petitioner-accused is present before the Court. The 1st respondent-complainant is not present before the Court. The petitioner’s case is that the 1st respondent-complainant has signed on the full satisfaction memo. In the above circumstances, the parties are directed to file necessary petition before the trial Court for recording the compromise. The trial Court is directed to pass appropriate orders and then report the matter to this Court.
Office is directed to transmit the lower Court records to the concerned.
Post the matter after receipt of report from the court concerned.”
Having perused the said order, this Court is of the view that no further orders need to be passed in this Revision. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
rd 0 3 February, 2011 DR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
First Respondent-Complainant
Coram
GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRC/499/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court