DISMISSED: The Criminal Revision Case was dismissed as having become infructuous because the main Miscellaneous Civil No.9 of 2011 had been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.196 of 2011
ORDER:
Sri C.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent, states that the main D.V.C.No.9 of 2011 has since been disposed of, the present Criminal Revision Case arising out of an interim order in Crl.MP.No.2887 of 2010 has become infructuous.
Duly recording the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as having become infructuous.
G.V.SEETHAPATHY,J
Date:18.07.2011 Usd
G.V.SEETHAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
