Court dismissed the criminal revision as the petitioner's counsel was absent and the petitioner appeared to show no interest in evincing any further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:1765 OF 2010
ORDER:
When this matter was taken up on 31.1.2011, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent. Hence, the matter was adjourned by one week. Again, when the matter was listed on 7.2.2011, the learned Counsel for the petitioner was absent and hence, this Court directed to list the matter on 8.2.2011. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned Counsel for the petitioner is absent. In those circumstances, it is clear that the learned Counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest.
Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.
___________________________ Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada
Dated: 8.2.2011 Nn
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:1765 OF 2010
8.2.2011
Gopala Krishna Tamada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
