Rs.20,00,000/- was paid and an agreement for sale was executed in favour of the 2nd respondent. In pursuance of the said agreement, A-1 to A-3 are stated to have gone to Sub-registrar’s office at Saroornagar for registration of 2 sale deeds in favour of the 2nd respondent on 02.12.2008. It is alleged that the 2nd respondent paid balance of consideration of Rs.10,50,000/- to the accused and went for payment of challans towards stamp duty and that by the time, the 2nd respondent paid amounts under challans and returned, A-1 to A-3 slipped away. It is further alleged that after receiving the entire sale consideration of Rs.30,50,000/-, the accused again entered into another agreement with one P.Kiran Kumar to sell the same plots and received advance sale consideration from him. According to the 2nd respondent, on 28.09.2009 when the 2nd respondent questioned A-1 to A-3 about receiving advance from Kiran Kumar, A-1 to A-3 threatened the 2nd respondent with dire consequences and to see end of the 2nd respondent. It is stated by the petitioners’ counsel that the 2nd respondent filed suit for specific performance of agreement for sale and that A-1 filed another suit for return of original title deeds and link documents from the 2nd respondent and that both the suits are pending. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that the case is one
