The petitioner who is stated to be an advocate, is accused of offence punishable under Section 427 I.P.C. The 1st respondent/de facto complainant is running a chicken center opposite to house of the petitioner at Machilipatnam. It is alleged that there was some dispute with regard to returning of chicken purchased by the petitioner and the 1st respondent refused to take return of the chicken sold and that therefore, the petitioner became angry and threw electronic weighing machine in the chicken center on road causing loss to the extent of Rs.8,000/-. It is contended by the petitioner’s counsel that the events narrated in FIR and charge sheet are unnatural and not believable. In order to find the same, it involves assessment of evidence to be let in by both the parties. This Court in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., cannot undertake the said exercise. It is for the trial Court to decide the same on merits, having regard to evidence to be let in by both the parties. There are no grounds for quashing charge sheet in this case.
