Crl.P. No. 5095 of 2009 dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner accused was discharged by the Juvenile Court, leaving no matter for adjudication.
petition dismissed as infructuous; nothing remains for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR
Crl.P. No. 5095 of 2009
DATED: 27.12.2011
Between: Md. Shah Nawaz .. Petitioner/ A8 And 1. The State of A.P. 2. S. Fathima 3. Kum. Humera Fathima .. Respondents
O R D E R:-
It is represented by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner/accused No.8 has been discharged by the Juvenile Court concerned.
In view of the representation, it follows that nothing remains for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
__________________ N. RAVI
SHANKAR, J
27.12.2011
bcj
Md. Shah Nawaz
The State of A.P.
S. Fathima
Kum. Humera Fathima
N. Ravi Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
