Criminal petition under Writ Jurisdiction. Due to lack of prosecution and no representation filed, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Criminal petition NO.4820 of 2009 is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4820 OF 2009
Date: 02.12.2011
Between:
Kanchan Chandrakanth Shirola And
…..Petitioner
The State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another
…..Respondents
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4820 OF 2009
ORDER:
No representation for petitioner though the matter is specifically posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. In the circumstances it follows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
2. In the circumstances, the criminal petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
___________________________ JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR
2nd December, 2011 Tjmr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4820 OF 2009
DATE: 02.12.2011
Kanchan Chandrakanth Shirola
The State of A.P.
N.Ravi Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
