Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ch.Satyanarayana, Vs State of A.P. — Telangana HC (2011) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2011
Ch.Satyanarayana, Vs State of A.P.Ch.Satyanarayana, v. State of A.P.

Dismissed

Ch.Satyanarayana, v. State of A.P.

Telangana HC29 Sept 2011CRLP/4112/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous by a single judge.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR

CRIMINAL PETITION No.4112 OF 2009

ORDER:

The learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the

matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR

Date:29.09.2011 INL

Coram

AI extract

B.CHANDRA KUMAR

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 29 Sept 2011 · September
Registered: 17 Jun 2009
Case no.: CRLP/4112/2009

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.chandra Kumar

B.S. Prabhakar, Vs Smt. v.Naga Lakshmi Alias Vijaya Lakshmi
28 Sept 2011
Smt. M. Sarojini Devi Vs Jugal Kishore Sanghi
28 Sept 2011
Smt. M. Sarojini Devi, Vs Jugal Kishore Sanghi
28 Sept 2011
P.Ramesh Babu, Vs The State of A.P.
29 Sept 2011

Cite this judgement

Ch.Satyanarayana, v. State of A.P., CRLP/4112/2009 (TEL), decided on 29 September 2011.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.CHANDRA KUMAR

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The single judge held that the matter had become infructuous and accordingly dismissed the criminal petition. No substantive legal propositions or facts were laid down.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CNR

HBHC010051702009

Bench

B.chandra Kumar

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Kada Krishna Rao Vs The State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor

29 Sept 2011

Goluguri Vani Subbalakshmini, Vs Grandhi Polayya

29 Sept 2011