A Single Chief Metropolitan Appeal was dismissed for want of representation by the appellant. No representation was filed despite the matter being posted for dismissal. Permission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
C.M.A.No. 143 of 2005
Date: 03-03-2011
Between:
The Property Association of Baptist Churches (P) Limited, Rep. by its Custodian, Balemia Anandam, S/o. Pitchaiah, R/o. H.No.5-4-64, Church Compound, Nalgonda.
…..Appellant
And
T.S. Yesuraju & others.
…..Respondents
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
C.M.A.No.143 of 2005
JUDGMENT:
No representation for the appellant though Sri Ch.Ganesh is reflected as the Counsel for the appellant. There is no representation even though the matter is posted to today under the caption for dismissal.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed without costs.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
Dt: 03.03.2011 Tjmr
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
C.M.A.No. 143 of 2005
DATE: 03.03.2011
The Property Association of Baptist Churches (P) Limited, Rep. by its Custodian, Balemia Anandam
T.S. Yesuraju & others
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
