A single judge held that the civil miscellaneous appeal had become infructuous and dismissed it accordingly without granting any order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
C.M.A.No.1002 OF 2006
Date:10-03-2011
Between:-
M/s.Sri Sai Vijay Lakshmi Silks, Secunderabad, rep.by its Managing Partner T.Rajakumari and others
.. Appellants/Respondents
And
G.Vinod Kumar and others
.. Respondents/Plaintiffs
JUDGMENT:-
Sri M.Surender Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, says that the appeal has become infructuous.
Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J
10th March, 2011 AMD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
C.M.A.No.1002 OF 2006
Date:10-03-2011
AMD
M/s.Sri Sai Vijay Lakshmi Silks
G.Vinod Kumar
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
