The petitioner sought dismissal of a contempt case for non-implementation of a prior order dated 10.06.2002, now complied with. The court held that the case had become infructuous and dismissed it with no order as to costs.
Contempt case dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURALBE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
C.C. No.669 of 2004
Between:
Smt.V.Ratnamba … Petitioner and
C.S.Viswanatham and others … Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
C.C. No.669 of 2004
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner represents that this contempt case has been filed complaining for non implementation of the order dated 10.06.2002 passed in W.P. No.525 of 2003 and now the same has been complied with. Therefore, this contempt case may be dismissed as infractuous.
Recording said submission, this contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
Date: 13.07.2011 LSK
V. Ratnamba
C.S. Viswanatham and others
G. Chandria
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
