S.Mahabub Bee v. The Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner complained of illegal detention, misuse of official capacity, and refusal to register a crime against her husband and sons regarding self-acquired property. Court accepted counsel's submission that a crime was subsequently registered, dismissing the need for further orders.
What did the court decide?
None. Writ petition closed on the submission that the complained-of grievance (non-registration of crime) was resolved by subsequent registration.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION No.7764 of 2010
Between:
S. Mahabub Bee
……PETITIONER(S)
and
The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool and others
……RESPONDENT(S)
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION No.7764 of 2010
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires further orders after the allegation is settled that a crime has been registered.
Whether the failure to register a crime and take action against misbehaving officials is redressible in this writ petition at this stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Mahabub Bee
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, Kurnool
- respondent
The Respondent 2 (husband of petitioner/named accused)
- respondent
The Respondent 3 (acting as 2nd respondent)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/7764/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court