Smt. Kaka Ademma, W/o. Pothuraju, v. The District Collector, Khammam.
Case brief
What is this about?
MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition…
MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
Writ Petition No. 596 of 2004
ORDER:
The petitioner states that she was engaged as a daily wage worker in the Government Ashram High School, Parakalagand, Khammam District, from 1994 onwards, and though she made repeated representations for regularization of her services, no action has been taken by the respondents 2 and 3.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
The appointment of the petitioner was on daily wage basis. Even the service certificate, that is issued to her, discloses that she was entrusted the work on working days and not during holidays, or vacations. The question of regularizing the services of a temporary or casual employee would arise, if only he or she is working against a specific post. The petitioner is not able to state the post, against which, she is said to have worked. Further, much would depend upon the availability of vacancies, and the inclination on the part of the employer, to make appointment. In case the respondents propose to fill the vacancies, to which the petitioner is otherwise qualified, she can make an application, in response to a notification. The feasibility of granting relaxation as to age can also be considered, as and when the necessity arises.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing that, in case the respondents take any steps to fill the vacancies, in which the petitioner is qualified, her case may be considered, if necessary, by giving relaxation, as to age limit, for the period during which, she is said to have worked in the institution.
There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J. Dt.23-09-2010. KO
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of her services as a daily wage worker who is unable to specify the post against which she worked.
Whether relaxation as to age limit should be granted to the petitioner for the period she worked in the institution.
Petitioner
Respondents 2 and 3
L. NARASIMHA REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court