M/s Holies Pharmaceuticals, v. The Principal District Judge cum Appellate Authority Under
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition listed for dismissal due to non-prosecution in absence of petitioner. Petition dismissed for want of appearance.
Writ petition listed for dismissal due to non-prosecution in absence of petitioner. Petition dismissed for want of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4874 OF 2000
ORDER:
Since none appeared for the petitioner on 6.8.2010, the writ petition was directed to be posted “for dismissal”. Today though the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither is the counsel for the petitioner present nor is there any representation on his behalf.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as costs.
asp
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court