The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the learned counsel submitted that the cause for adjudication no longer survives.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
WRIT PETITION NO. 2675 OF 2005
Monday, the Thirteenth day of December, Two Thousand and ten
Between:
Gunda Eswara Rao
Petitioner
AND
Principal Secretary to the Government, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (MDL-IIA) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another
Respondents
ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
_________________ Justice C.V. Ramulu
December 13, 2010 MAS
Gunda Eswara Rao
Principal Secretary to the Government, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (MDL-IIA) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
another
C.V. Ramulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
