Dismissed
N. Sathyanesan, v. The Union of India
Telangana HCWP/22155/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition held infructuous by the court dismissing the petition with no costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petition held infructuous by the court dismissing the petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 22155 OF 2004
DATED 1ST FEBRUARY, 2010.
BETWEEN
N.Sathyanesan …Petitioner
And
The Union of India, rep. by its Director, General Central, Indu8strial Security Force, Ministry of Hone Affairs, 13, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi and ors.
….Respondents.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 22155 OF 2004
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri B.Parameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
------------------------------JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
DATED 1ST FEBRUARY, 2010. Msnr.
N.Sathyanesan
The Union of India, rep. by its Director, General Central, Indu8strial Security Force, Ministry of Hone Affairs, 13, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi and ors.
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court